Welcome to our research page, where you can explore the latest findings from the Neuro Navigation research team. Here, we share our groundbreaking studies and innovative approaches to enhance understanding and advancements in neurodiversity. Stay updated with our ongoing projects and discover how our work contributes to the field.
Thank you for visiting!
Reading Between the Lines: A Systematic Comparative Analysis
Developmental dyslexia affects up to 20% of school‑age children worldwide. Despite decades of research on Structured Literacy and multisensory phonics-based intervention, families and educators still navigate a fragmented marketplace of branded programs whose marketing claims often exceed their empirical support. We conducted a systematic comparative review of ten widely used interventions, including Orton‑Gillingham, Wilson, Barton, LiPS, Nessy, the Davis Method, Beyond Decodables, Equipped for Reading Success, EBLI, and the Pavlidis Method, using PRISMA 2020 standards, the GRADE framework, and attention to cross‑linguistic applicability. Results show a marked gap between program promotion and research quality: several popular approaches lack studies meeting What Works Clearinghouse criteria, while some less commercialized programs demonstrate replicable, modest-to-moderate gains in foundational decoding skills. Based on these results we've added a decision framework to guide parents and educators in selecting evidence‑aligned interventions for neurodivergent learners.
Beyond the Pill: A Systematic Comparative Review of Executive Function Intervention Programs for Learners with ADHD
ADHD is very common in children and teens, and many kids struggle with executive function skills, things like staying organized, managing time, remembering instructions, and controlling impulses. Medicine can help, but many families also look for non‑medication options that build these skills.
This review looked at the research behind eight major types of non‑medication programs, including working‑memory training (like Cogmed), computer‑based brain‑training apps, classroom behavior plans, organizational‑skills coaching, mindfulness programs, neurofeedback, and structured exercise.
The studies showed mixed results. Some programs, like Organizational Skills Training and Daily Report Cards, had the strongest real‑world improvements. Exercise programs also helped with focus and self‑control. Cogmed improved memory on the tasks it teaches, but didn’t consistently reduce ADHD symptoms in daily life. Mindfulness helped some families, especially with parent‑rated symptoms. Other programs, like some computer‑training apps and neurofeedback, had weaker or inconsistent evidence.
Overall, no single program works best for every child. The strongest approach combines several strategies like behavior supports, skill‑building, and physical activity and adapts them to the child’s home and school environment.
The research includes a simple comparison tool to help families and professionals choose the options that fit a child’s needs.
03
Project Name
This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.
04
Project Name
This is your Project description. Provide a brief summary to help visitors understand the context and background of your work. Click on "Edit Text" or double click on the text box to start.